Comparative Efficacy of Sunitinib versus Sorafenib as First-Line Treatment for Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

Background: This study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of sorafenib and sunitinib as primary treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: We identified 49 and 220 patients treated with sorafenib and sunitinib, respectively, as first-line therapy in the Asan Medical Centre from April 2005 to March 2011. Results: Disease control rates of 71 and 74% were achieved with sorafenib and sunitinib, respectively (p = 0.687). After a median follow-up of 27.6 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the sorafenib and the sunitinib group (PFS 8.6 vs. 9.9 months, respectively, p = 0.948, and OS 25.7 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.774). Patients treated with sorafenib required dose reduction due to toxicities less frequently than those treated with sunitinib (37 vs. 54%, p = 0.034). Haematological toxicity of grade 3 or 4 was more common in the sunitinib group than in the sorafenib group (45 vs. 4%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed old age, Heng’s risk group, and bone and liver metastases, but not the type of vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibReceived: August 13, 2012 Accepted after revision: December 13, 2012 Published online: March 20, 2013 Jae-Lyun Lee, MD, PhD Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Centre University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil , Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736 (Korea) E-Mail jaelyun @ amc.seoul.kr © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel 0009–3157/13/0586–0468$38.00/0